The Cesspool That Brought Us Obama
Dean
As I've said many times, Chicago politics are unbelievably corrupt. Possibly the only place worse is Louisiana. And it looks like those chickens are coming home to roost.
If Obama can't weather it now, he certainly won't be able to in the general election. He's going to have to talk about this, and talk about why he wants to clean up Washington even though he came up and succeeded in an environment that makes Washington DC look like a model of clean and honorable government. Doubtless his supporters will call such question "smears," but to the rest of us that will just look like tap-dancing.
By the way, is he anti-NAFTA or not? Apparently, it's anyone's guess. I guess that's what he means by the audacity of hope, or something.









I guess my general principle on the campaign season still holds:
Any discussion on something OTHER than the merits or demerits of a particular extant issue affecting the general population is a distraction.
So, Yes, NAFTA criticism and praise is totally fair game -- but the Rezko stuff, I gotta say, doesn't hold much interest for me.
HankB
Still, unless there's a lot more direct involvement on Senator Obama's part yet to be revealed, I honestly don't expect this to be a big issue. Right now, it's at the same level as the left's ridiculous Cheney-Bush-Halliburton fixation, which the public has successfully ignored. Guilt by association may be good for riling up those who already oppose a candidate, but it doesn't seem to persuade those who are neutral or supportive. I think the people are smarter than the political operatives give them credit for.
I'm not seeing anything here that says Obama is a "product" of the cesspool.
I'll let this guy answer you (outlining added)...
So you chose the least of the four pillars of the article, and made that your argument. I could have made a pretty damning argument by selectively quoting some of the other points.
I don't think the comment's irrelevant, but it's the "yes, but" of the article.
The point of the article is chicago politics, and obama's condemnation of dirty politics, and the intersection of these things. But nowhere is there any argument regarding Obama being a product of those politics (implying he is dirty as the system). Instead oif anything the raticle paints a grim picture of chicago politics and then gets a admission from the fiercest critic that Obama isnt of that mold!
This isn't rocket science - power without balance results in corruption. Detroit, Chicago, the former Soviet Union. History is my cite.
As an ex-Louisiana citizen, I have to say that in Louisiana at least we always had Arkansas we could point to as the one state that was more corrupt, and Mississippi as the one state with the lower average IQ.
Mississippi has topped Louisiana in the IQ department lately, but I think Arkansas still has the title for "most corrupt" state.
Of course we all lose our tempers now and then. Dean freely admits to being imperfect in this regard, which is why regulars to this establishment will generally be cut more slack than people who we don't know very well.
Still: behave like an adult, or go find somewhere else to play. Thanks.