Contrasts
Dave Price
Ronald Reagan's announcement of his candidacy for President of the United States.
Barack Obama's announcement of his candidacy for President of the United States.
Reagan:
To me our country is a living, breathing presence, unimpressed by what others say is impossible, proud of its own success, generous, yes and naïve, sometimes wrong, never mean and always impatient to provide a better life for its people in a framework of a basic fairness and freedom.Obama:
Someone once said that the difference between an American and any other kind of person is that an American lives in anticipation of the future because he knows it will be a great place. Other people fear the future as just a repetition of past failures. There’s a lot of truth in that. If there is one thing we are sure of it is that history need not be relived; that nothing is impossible, and that man is capable of improving his circumstances beyond what we are told is fact.
...
The crisis we face is not the result of any failure of the American spirit; it is a failure of our leaders to establish rational goals and give our people something to order their lives by.
For the last six years we've been told that our mounting debts don't matter, we've been told that the anxiety Americans feel about rising health care costs and stagnant wages are an illusion, we've been told that climate change is a hoax, and that tough talk and an ill-conceived war can replace diplomacy, and strategy, and foresight. And when all else fails, when Katrina happens, or the death toll in Iraq mounts, we've been told that our crises are somebody else's fault. We're distracted from our real failures, and told to blame the other party, or gay people, or immigrants.Reagan:
The people have not created this disaster in our economy; the federal government has. It has overspent, overestimated, and over regulated.Obama:
...
The 10th article of the Bill of Rights is explicit in pointing out that the federal government should do only those things specifically called for in the Constitution. All others shall remain with the states or the people. We haven’t been observing that 10th article of late. The federal government has taken on functions it was never intended to perform and which it does not perform well. There should be a planned, orderly transfer of such functions to states and communities and a transfer with them of the sources of taxation to pay for them.
..
We have long since committed ourselves, as a people, to help those among us who cannot take care of themselves. But the federal government has proven to be the costliest and most inefficient provider of such help we could possibly have.
government will play a crucial role in bringing about the changes we needReagan:
...
Let's be the generation that says right here, right now, that we will have universal health care in America
...
We can set up a system for capping greenhouse gases.
...
Let's recruit a new army of teachers
...
Let's make college more affordable, and let's invest in scientific research, and let's lay down broadband lines
On the foreign front, the decade of the 1980’s will place severe pressures upon the United States and its allies. We can expect to be tested in ways calculated to try our patience, to confound our resolve and to erode our belief in ourselves. During a time when the Soviet Union may enjoy nuclear superiority over this country, we must never waiver in our commitment to our allies nor accept any negotiation which is not clearly in the national interest. We must judge carefully. Though we should leave no initiative untried in our pursuit of peace, we must be clear voiced in our resolve to resist any unpeaceful act wherever it may occur. Negotiations with the Soviet Union must never become appeasement.Obama:
For the most of the last forty years, we have been preoccupied with the global struggle – the competition – with the Soviet Union and with our responsibilities to our allies. But too often in recent times we have just drifted along with events, responding as if we thought of ourselves as a nation in decline. To our allies we seem to appear to be a nation unable to make decisions in its own interests, let alone in the common interest. Since the Second World War we have spent large amounts of money and much of our time protecting and defending freedom all over the world. We must continue this, for if we do not accept the responsibilities of leadership, who will? And if no one will, how will we survive?
But all of this cannot come to pass until we bring an end to this war in Iraq. Most of you know I opposed this war from the start. I thought it was a tragic mistake. Today we grieve for the families who have lost loved ones, the hearts that have been broken, and the young lives that could have been. America, it's time to start bringing our troops home. It's time to admit that no amount of American lives can resolve the political disagreement that lies at the heart of someone else's civil war. That's why I have a plan that will bring our combat troops home by March of 2008.
(hide)









And Mark, I think you're really missing the big picture. The important thing in any endeavor is that you really want to help. Technique is no more important in politics than it is, in say, handling nuclear waste or high explosives. Earnestness is almost always the more important factor.
And whatever happened to the good ole pre GW Bush days when all democrats hated and reviled Reagan as Satansfist?
I guess time and nostalgia really does mellow all antichrists.
Democrats of today, expect your children and grandchildren to look back fondly on our current president as an example of how their future leaders should walk and talk.
Heehaw!
I don't how much clearer it could be.
Obama says Americans failed. Reagan says the government failed.
Reagan says we need less gov't. Obama says we need more gov't.
Reagan says we need to fight for freedom. Obama says we need to surrender and come home.
Like he isn't a native of Illinois, then again, maybe he wants his face on the penny rather than Lincoln's.
I suppose that's a good enough reason to run since there wont be much left after his presidential spending spree to fund the glorious programs he intends to impose.
Does this sound like Obama or what ?
"Changes in society are due chiefly to the development of the internal contradictions in society, that is, the contradiction between the productive forces and the relations of production, the contradiction between classes and the contradiction between the old and the new, it is the development of these contradictions that pushes society forward and gives the impetus for the suppression of the old society by the new."
Chairman Mao, Selected Works (August 1937), Vol I, p 314
To say that what Reagan said is anywhere close to what Obama is saying is silly. Yes they both say they want to help, but are going in completely opposite directions in how they want to help.
You seem to reveal more about your views through satire than prose. It's wise, because you get to make your point without needing to debate what any person deems a challenge to them. I think that the back and forth of the debate hurts the diversity of expressed views, and therefore lessens the total information content of the medium. That is why I think there is much value in echo chamber blogs, as
most of the participants agree on the underlying premises or axioms and are thus able to build on them higher constructs. Some will say that the debate helps to clarify the truth, and I guess that's sorta true. Depends on the reader, mostly.
Of course we all lose our tempers now and then. Dean freely admits to being imperfect in this regard, which is why regulars to this establishment will generally be cut more slack than people who we don't know very well.
Still: behave like an adult, or go find somewhere else to play. Thanks.