Dean's World

Defending the liberal tradition in history, science, and philosophy.

Judgment Day

New York Supreme Court, New York County

I'd like to say I am offended by the very idea of a "litmus" test to be a contributor to Dean's World, but that would be fatuous of me. If we had a real Nazi or left-wing nut on this blog I'd be IM'ing Dean to do something about it. Of course there's a litmus test of "sanity."

But I don't know if I can buy into Dean's definitions, and his refusal — rather impatiently expressed — even to acknowledge that with his #3 on the list, he has a lot of people of good faith and fair intellect scratching their heads.

I was very inclined to wait this out, but then in the comments someone raised the issue of "Galileos" on the masthead. I don't want it to be inferred that in order to have access to this platform — which I value highly, as Dean knows well — I am going along with what are arguably controversial propositions. I think Dean is grossly oversimplifying the issue, one of the most important and controversial in the world today. I think, for what it's worth, that he's doing so because of a powerful inclination he has to do the right thing, especially by underdogs.

Why he thinks Muslims are underdogs in this time (and place), as I have said before, I do not know. I've been a little annoyed by the suggestions that as a Jew, I should be the one to be most sympathetic to the plight of the oppressed Muslim, which frankly I believe is preposterous. As a Jew I am the number-one guy in the gunsight of the oppressed Muslim, just because of who I am. Not every Muslim kills Jews, but in my lifetime no one has killed as many Jews as Muslims. I won't have my view of what that implies about Muslim civilization dictated to me by anyone.

Just as Dean has certain things that he's really picky about, I do too. And number one is being told. Tied for number one is cowardice. Those are my lines in the sand.

So by drawing his line in the sand Dean has forced my hand. Not because I'm an "Islamophobe." My way of life as a strictly orthodox Jew has more in common with that of religious Muslims than Dean's does, and then some. But I won't be cornered this way. It's a bit of a precedent issue — where will Dean draw the next line? I don't want to find out or to worry about it.

My friends, as we've all acknowledged, it's Dean's World, and we just live in it. I didn't make this a top-whatever blog, but I benefited tremendously by it being one — and it's Dean who made it one. Do you ever marvel at the broad range of topics Dean writes well about? I do. Okay, sometimes it's broad to a fault — I often chide Dean for wasting time on stuff like American Idol. But that's why he has a great general-interest blog that is full of ads and gets massive hits and I write about things like the CitiGroup umbrella for under a thousand of my closest friends every day.

It's been a privilege to participate, in the most literal sense. I wish there were another gig of this quality waiting out there for me, but I don't think there is. I must say (I always must; that's one of my problems) I went out with a bang — got us linked from Instapundit and Power Line in one day, on one post; but that post was, evidently, exemplary of the rub here.

For these reasons I am withdrawing from the World. I have no plans or predispositions regarding blogging or writing other than to continue with my narrow-gauge blog on intellectual property law, LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION. I can't think of too many people who are as like-minded about so many things as Dean and I, especially regarding personal relationships. I feel no rancor towards Dean, only gratitude of the highest order, and I absolutely hope he will continue to consider me a friend, as I do him. And so, too, the rest of you. Goodbye, cool World!

Posted by Ron Coleman | Permalink | Technorati Trackbacks
Michael Demmons (mail) (www):
Ron: Good for you. I absolutely agree with your reasons for doing so. I liked your posts, because they often got me to thinking, even when I disagreed. Thanks for contributing here!! And good luck.
2.28.2007 12:40pm
Sean Golden (mail) (www):
Ron:

As one of your most frequent foils, I too hate to see you go. I may soon be joining you for all the same reasons, but I'm hoping that Dean realizes that his line in the sand has been drawn poorly.

Like you Dean is my largest blog referrer to CosmicConservative. I too consider Dean to be a friend, I worked with him once briefly in a previous life, and I know he's a good guy with a deep concern for, as you say, the underdog.

Good luck, maybe another gig does await you. I'm still waiting for mine. ;-)
2.28.2007 1:39pm
jaymaster (mail):
I hate to see you going too, Ron. But I understand.

Peace be upon you.
2.28.2007 1:50pm
K :
I thought Dean was going too far. But he seems to have a strong sense that you play by his rules or find another playground.

He has been upset with me at times. As a mere mortal I await the decision from the god in the machine.

Good luck.
2.28.2007 1:56pm
Vern III (mail) (www):
I read Ron's post and two items stuck out the most for me: "And number one is being told. Tied for number one is cowardice."

I'm not a front pager, just a commenter. While I rarely post, I liked having the option to if I wanted to join the discussion. I believe that I've not gotten out of line, while still saying what I thought needed to be said.

Regardless of the rest of Ron's post or the points that Dean has outlined, and regardless of whether or not I agree with any of it... I won't allow myself to let someone else dictate how I think. If I don't withdraw now, then by inaction/complacency, I would be allowing just that.

Dean and Queen, best wishes to you and yours. Feel free to take me off of your list of submitters. If, in the future, you decide to reconsider your choice, then I would be willing to consider being a submitter again.

It's been interesting. I believe that it was here that I found out about the Hurricane Katrina Kids Relief convoy. That in itself changed my life.

Vern
2.28.2007 2:28pm
Rosemary Esmay (www):
Vern:

Dean and I are not united on this one. See my post above.
2.28.2007 2:37pm
Vern III (mail):
I am sorry Rosemary. I should have gone to your site first. I would be honored to be a commenter on your site, even if I rarely post.

I actually have tears in my eyes as I'm writing this, dammit.

Vern
2.28.2007 2:46pm
Rosemary Esmay (www):
Well, come on down then!
2.28.2007 2:49pm
Bryan Costin (mail) (www):
I'm sorry to see you go, Ron. You have a very interesting point of view and I have always enjoyed your posts.
2.28.2007 4:24pm
Andrew Ian Dodge (mail) (www):
Ron you are welcome to come blog for me. We have a more realistic view is Islam on my blog...some of us having been near the more nasty variety. We don't censor you but expect you to take criticism like the rest of us. I would extend this invitation to anyone else who contributes here and feels no longer welcome.
2.28.2007 6:24pm
Martin L. Shoemaker (www):
Ron,

You'll be missed. You have to do what you have to do, I understand.
2.28.2007 8:28pm
Ronald Coleman (mail) (www):
Thank you all for your kind remarks!
2.28.2007 11:50pm
Account:
Password:
Remember info?
Commenting on Dean's World is a privilege, not a right. Dean is your host, you are his guest, and you should behave in that fashion. Dean is not your babysitter, nor is he your punching bag. Please remember this. In general, you are free to disagree with anyone on any subject you wish, but abusive behavior will not be tolerated.

Of course we all lose our tempers now and then. Dean freely admits to being imperfect in this regard, which is why regulars to this establishment will generally be cut more slack than people who we don't know very well.

Still: behave like an adult, or go find somewhere else to play. Thanks.