My Conversation With Jamal Miftah
Ali Eteraz
The rightosphere was all over the news about Jamal Miftah, the guy in Oklahoma who wrote an article condemning bin Laden and then subsequently got kicked out of his mosque. Good for the rightosphere.
But once the rightosphere had done their celebratory dance about how there are no "moderate" Muslims, it went along on its merry way. Meanwhile, I went and talked to Miftah. You think the rightosphere would want to follow up on it since they are so serious about empowering moderates.
Not quite. I gave it a day and a half to see if any of the big boys — hell, even little boys — would pick up my conversation with Miftah. Plenty of my readers went out and touted it. Nada. Oh look its me, having to do it all by my effing self, yet again.
So let me get this right: the NYT and MSM doesn't empower Muslim moderates because that doesn't suit their agenda; meanwhile the rightosphere claims that it does empower the moderates by highlighting them, and yet, it doesn't follow up on some of the biggest stories. This isn't big?
A case of "oversight"? I'm not so sure anymore.
Frankly, I think there's a snow job going on all over the news because, at the end of the day, its more fun to bitch about how there are no "moderates" (or how they are treated) than to actually spread their word far and wide.
Oh, and if any of you dare to give me a thankful back slap to say "keep up the good work Ali" I'm going to get even more pissed, so don't even try.









And you have here a potential audience of 30,000 readers a day. Did you post a mention of the story here, so people would go check it out? Good grief, man, some of us would love to have a corner of Dean's soapbox, so we could draw more audience to our blogs. We have to wait until weekend open thread if we have something important to link, or else notify Dean and hope he has time to notice it and decides it's worthy of promotion. You have free rein to promote yourself here; and so far, you've used it well on multiple occasions, promoting some very important posts. But this time, you didn't. And that's the rightosphere's fault?
This is just another variation of the "strangely silent" critique.
Anyway, if you want to convince more righties that Muslim moderates are more than a mere mirage, what really needs to happen is more Muslims standing up for people like Miftah. Clearly something is rotten at the IST and your suggestion for democratic reforms is excellent, but where are the moderate groups to counter them? If organizations like CAIR are full of moderates, where are they on this?
As I've said before, the moderates' is the most onerous burden in this ideological struggle. In their place, I'm not sure I would have the courage to risk the ostracization and death threats from the extremists. But Muslims need to decide whether the soul of Islam is worth fighting for.
But Ali, I must say Martin's got a point: waiting to be noticed is not sufficient. You need to develop relationships with people. You need to start sending them notes. Friendly notes. Don't just count on friends to run around dropping comments, which may not be seen. There's only one way to get a blogger's attention: write them and ask them for it.
"Hi Glenn, remember this story you mentioned on X? Well look, I did a followup with the guy. Here's the link, think your readers would be interested?"
"Hi Captain Ed, remember this story you mentioned on X? Well look, I did a followup with the guy. Here's the link, think your readers would be interested?"
"Hi Michelle, remember this story you mentioned on X? Well look, I did a followup with the guy. Here's the link, think your readers would be interested?"
"Hi Bill, remember this story you mentioned on X? Well look, I did a followup with the guy. Here's the link, think your readers would be interested?"
"Hi Charles, remember this story you mentioned on X? Well look, I did a followup with the guy. Here's the link, think your readers would be interested?"
"Hi Anchoress, remember this story you mentioned on X? Well look, I did a followup with the guy. Here's the link, think your readers would be interested?"
Develop a list of 10 or 15 or more such people and send them such letters. And not just once, but semi-regularly.
They won't all link everything. Some may take days to respond. Some may miss your mail entirely (we get a lot of mail you know). They may be tired, cranky, busy with something else. Or they may just hate you, but don't make that determination until they've shot you down repeatedly. And by "repeatedly" I mean 10 or 15 times with no response.
This is how the game works.
It needs to be targeted as a specific individual. To be blunt, any time I get an email asking me for a link, if my name is not clearly at the top, or there are more than a small handful of people cc'd on the thing, I delete it without looking more than 95% of the time. I suspect I'm not alone on that; obvious spamming is just rude.
I think Ali's point here is that by and large all of the attention this story has gotten is like "Moderate Muslim gets ostracized over editorial." It's the ostracization that is getting the airplay, and perhaps rightfully so. But the issue is that no one is bothering to a) find out what Mifta has to say, or b) spread his message. If a blog claims to care about moderate muslims, they should be trumpeting the moderate message instead of (or at least in addition to) engaging in point-scoring over how this or that moderate was treated.
That's a lot of effort, admittedly. It gets even harder when you have to go through the target blog and find the citations that you're asking to be followed-up. I think that's why they call it 'work'.
But waiting for people to notice isn't a very productive use of time, even if you're not doing anything.
One moderate identified, hundreds of non-moderates identified.
I feel better. Not.
I also feel sorry for the guy, in part because it looks as if a good part of his self-identification is in being part of this congregation. Which turns out to be mostly buttheads.
He should break away and, in company with all those other moderate Muslims out there, start a moderate mosque and hire a non-Wahhabi preacher.
"Uh, dude, did you think to ask?"
Great idea! Now that would be poetic justice.
Hey, that's how Martin Luther got started, isn't it?
I would donate to that cause. I'll even loan him some nails and a hammer.
Unfair or not, the sensational and controversial gets the press. That's not just true of stories on moderate Muslims.
Well, Ali is doing something few blogs do: reporting. Dean has done it from time to time. Michael Totten and Bill from INDC and a few other bloggers have made it a habit (or a passion). But most bloggers only comment on the news someone else reports. For them to trumpet the moderate message, someone else has to report it first. Like Ali. (I would slap him on the back for that and tell him to keep up the good work, but that would piss him off.) But then the reporter also has to bring it to their attention somehow.
News is man bites dog.
Since there are so many moderate Muslims out there--just ask Dean--a moderate message is dog bites man. Shouldn't be news.
Since there are so many moderate Muslims out there--just ask Dean--finding a large number of immoderate Muslims giving a moderate Muslim a hard time is man bites dog. It's such a rare thing, and so unlikely, too, considering how few immoderate Muslims there are.
Some of you seem to think the moderate message is a huge deal. That's a problem. Because it's only a huge deal if it's extremely rare. If it happened all the time, there'd be no reason to remark on it. Careful how you frame this thing.
The hard time the guy gets isn't news only to the extent it's quite common. So if you don't think it's news, you must think.... See what happens when you get enthusiastic and speak before considering?
I was being a bit nasty about suggesting a new mosque. If being in a mosque run by nutcases were any reason to start your own, there'd be a bunch of folks meeting in temporary quarters trying to work out a building fund. From the outside, it appears that being in a congregation run by nutcases isn't driving out the moderate Muslims, who, remember, are the majority.
Here's a clue: Most don't. Oh, they care in the sense that they want to see more moderates and less extremists - we all do - but virtually none of them are focused on moderate muslims at all. Many of the right blogs are - when following any of that at all - concerned with the GWoT, it's progress, possible strategies, our soldiers, etc. Nuts and bolts stuff. The story about whats-his-name never even crossed my radar and I read a lot of blogs.
As mentioned earlier, most of the Rightosphere focus has been on radical Islam. I personally think that is half of where the attention needs to be -- the other half should be placed on Muslims promoting peace and denouncing terror (such as Mr. Miftah). I am alarmed that many Rightosphere pundits no longer wish any discernment be made between the radicals and the rest of the Muslim populace.
Sad, sad, sad.
I am alarmed that many Muslims assume that to be true, and don't even make the effort to reach out to people on the right who can't comment on what they don't know about.
Again.
I had a Jordanian Muslim roommate. I've had Muslim classmates and coworkers. But I didn't know many Muslims, and not many well. So I was one who used to say, "I've got nothing against Muslims, but why aren't they speaking out against the nutjobs? Where are the moderate Muslims?"
And Dean said, "Everywhere. Just look." Living and working in the Dearborn area, he lived with moderate Muslims and did business with them every day.
And then to prove his point, he made a distinct effort to hunt up and publicize every story of moderate, terror-condemning Muslims he could find. And I stopped asking the question any more. Dean proved to me that if I wasn't hearing from moderate Muslims, it was because the major news outlets couldn't be bothered to put their message out. Oh, they would put on Muslim firebrands to get on some TV shout fest; but a simple guy like Jamal Miftah, speaking his mind and standing on his principles, would never get attention. He might make a local outlet like the Tulsa World; but he wouldn't make it to a national outlet.
And then Dean made it a point to invite Aziz, and now yourself, to contribute to his blog, because he wants a diverse community where intelligent voices from every viewpoint and background can be heard. He didn't invite you as "token Muslims", else he would exercise control over what you write; but your perspectives and experiences as Muslims are definitely a part of the value you bring to this conversation. I've learned a lot from both of you, perhaps especially when I disagree with you.
And Lord knows, Dean has caught all sorts of grief and even lost readers and possibly friends for his tireless efforts to confront, mock, and discredit genuine Islamophobia of every sort. He steadfastly believes that alienating moderate Muslims is a horrible error, because we need you on our side against the kooks. And for that, he gets mocked, and some commenters go out of their way to point out what they perceive as his naivete at every chance they get.
So if you want to go to some corners of the center-right blogosphere and complain that they don't care about moderate Muslims, go ahead. I still think you're off base, and should try to work with them to get your message out. Some of them might surprise you. Still, you might have a case there.
But to come to Dean's World and make that complaint makes me wonder whether you have any idea what Dean's about at all. I gotta tell you, it's pretty discouraging for a guy like me, who's trying to open my mind and understand more, to see a guy like Dean get tarred with this particular brush. If there's one non-Muslim out there who's trying to help moderate Muslims and non-Muslims to understand each other and learn to work together against a common enemy and toward common goals, it's Dean Esmay.
He is very supportive of your project Ali.
and...he isn't done yet.
i'll leave you with that tantalizing hint.
=)