Dean's World

Defending the liberal tradition in history, science, and philosophy.

the borg

The WaPo claims that American muslims are not assimilated. I say we are.

Posted by Aziz P | Permalink | Technorati Trackbacks
Mike "Veeshir" Fisher (mail):
As I expected, the headline doesn't match the story.

I stopped reading the Wash Post for just that reason. What the author found out is that they were using "assimilate" to mean "give up my faith". She equates wearing the hajib to not assimilating.
refers to such young Muslims as the "rejectionist generation." They are rejectionist, he says, because they turn their backs not only on absolutist religious interpretations, but also on America's secular ways.
She seems to think that's a bad thing.

So we have to be strategic in our thinking, because people who are our enemies are strategic in their thinking."

The "enemies" Yusuf referred to that day were not non-Muslims, but rather those who use Islam as a rationale for violence.

I see absolutely nothing objectionable with that.

They looked pretty assimilated to me. They just wanted to be able to practice their faith as they see fit. You know, the whole reason people came to America in the first place.

The author obviously thinks that in order to assimilate in America you have to give up your religion and ways. To misquote the Princess Bride
Geneive Abdo: He didn't assimilate.
Inigo Montoya: You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means
8.29.2006 4:47pm
Arnold Harris (mail):
I don't think so, Aziz. If you were assimilated as you claim, you wouldn't be ambulating around the USA with a name like "Aziz". However brought you have from the islamic land of your origin (India, I suppose?), would have given a thoroughly american name, even if he/she/they took you to a muslim place of worship each week.

I read the article you cited very carefully. The reporter cited strong evidence that american Muslims are feeling increasingly alienated since September 11, 2001, with a feeling -- probably justified -- that events are making the United States and most of its people outright enemies of Islam. The response of many islamic young people around this country to identify with world Islam, not with the culture of the west in general and the United States in particular.

All those headscarves among islamic women, for instance. As the man at the vegetable counter hinted to one of the women interviewed by the reporter, that being dressed like that gives the wearer an appearance of a freak in the middle of an american super-market.

Likewise, the increasing attendance at focus on strictly-islamic patterns of social behavior. In short, most of your co-religionists are beginning to act the same as did the Jews of Europe, who made themselves even more socially isolated with each passing generation. In the end, they feared and hated all the "goyim", and all the goyim grew to despise the Jews all the more than they would have if the Jews had simply assimilated to the local cultures.

If all this keeps up, your people here in the West are headed for a great crack-up. The more your numbers grow, the more some of your people may become emboldened to threaten the fundementally christian and western societies around them. Isn't that exactly what has been happening with second and third-generation Muslims in the United Kingdom, along with their native-english wives? At which point, all of you, regardless of your personal leanings, will be treated as outright enemies. Then matters will slide rapidly downhill from there.

I know all this sounds ugly. And I also know by now that you are a square shooter working to make it as both an American and a Muslim. And I'm not just saying that because you told me you were born in my home town.

But some day, the way things are going, you probably will be pressured by societal directions outside your control to choose the predominance of one or the other. I hope that pressure, if an when it comes, doesn't crush the essential Aziz Poonawalla.

Arnold Harris
Mount Horeb WI
8.29.2006 5:00pm
Kevin D (mail) (www):
It's a tricky question. I know there have been Muslims asked what is more important - their faith or loyalty to their nation. They answer the former and are accused of not assimiliating. Well, I can say that my faith is more important to me than my loyalty to my nation too. Would anyone accuse me of not being properly assimiliated? Of course not.

Just becuase my faith is more important to me than my nation doesn't mean I don't love my nation. My wife is the most important woman in my life. That doesn't mean I don't love my mother.

I think most Muslims are assimilated into the American fabric. If we want to see an example of non-assimiliation of Muslims into the west we need to look at London and the riots in France. That's the face of non-assimiliation. I don't really think we have that problem here with Muslims.

Illegals from Mexico on the other hand...
8.29.2006 5:00pm
Aziz (mail) (www):
Mike, we might not agree often, but you nailed this one. Your response is better than my post. I am humbled.
8.29.2006 5:01pm
Aziz (mail) (www):
Arnold,

it's not even the slightest pressure. its nothing. Its trivial. Its less than a feather. I am muslim, I am an american, and there really isn't anything that anyone can do to me to make those become in conflict. Not even muslim-only airport lines.

The whole issue of identity is really not as critical as modernity. Its reconciling tradition with modernity that is tricky. We all have multiple identities and we rarely "choose" one over another, but the conflict between modernity and tradition is sometimes trickier to navigate. The way in which my own community (the Dawoodi Bohras) achieves this feat was nicely described by Jonah Blank in his book, Mullahs on the Mainframe, of which you can read an excerpt here and which I myself reviewed here.
8.29.2006 5:05pm
Dean Esmay:
Funny, most of my Polish relatives have not opted to change their names after moving to this country, and yet few are accused of not assimilating.

We have a fairly large Orthodox Jewish community here, where the men and women wear traditional garb that makes them stand out somewhat in crowds. No one treats them like freaks. Ditto the Amish.

Freedom of religion is one of the things that makes us most uniquely American.

And what has the problem been in France and the United Kingdom? That they've done the exact opposite--they've embraced a weak-tea "multiculturalism" which instead of stressing the universal values of their country tended instead to treat each immigrant group as a distinct, separate culture. Which resulted in failure to assimilate, and instead into ghettoization--with all the attendant sequalae that ghettoization always brings (crime, alienation, "us vs. them" thinking, and etc.).
8.29.2006 5:11pm
John_B (mail) (www):
I'm pondering all those kids I grew up with: Sean, Seamus, Liam, Jacques, Marcantonio, Michal... They were all pretty well assimilated back in the 50s, even if their parents or grandparents spoke other languages. We all went to the same schools, ate (more or less) the same junk foods, got in the same trouble, avoided each others' sisters like the plague.

There was some commotion when it came time for me to be named, though. My mother wanted me to be Sean; my father would agree only if my middle name was Francois. They came to a reasonable compromise.

But my father was the only one in his family with the anglicized form of the family name: Burgess. All his siblings, as his parents, were legally Bourgoise. They somehow managed to assimilate, despite the burden of foreign names.

And anyway, Americans are perfectly adept at butchering the pronunciation (and eventually the spelling) of foreign names. It's not De Noiy yay, but De Noi yer; not Pel les iyay, but Pel les iyer.

The WaPo article, though (to get back on point) does point to a misapprehension of what "assimilate" means. I discuss it here.
8.29.2006 5:23pm
Arnold Harris (mail):
Dean, the orthodox jewish community are even less assimilated than their muslim counterparts. And they way they dress for the street makes them look like freaks, too.

But if all the Jews in this country acted, dressed, and isolated themselves into the modern version of east european stetls as do many of the orthodox, the Jews in this country would be as shunned here as they were all across the old jewish homelands of eastern Europe.

But orthodox Jews are not the people plotting secretely to plow four jet civilian airliners, laden with inflammable fuel and helpless passengers, into both towers of the World Trade Center, the headquarters of the US Defense Department, and probably the US Capitol, which was the likely target of the fourth aircraft.

Nor are Poles or french Canadians considered to be members of an alien and mostly hostile civilization by most Amreicans, which is becoming the univesal status that Islam is sliding into.

I say again. Large numbers of islamic persons have settled into western societies. External events have put western civilization into a state of conflict with Islam. If not all Islam, enough of it to cause feelings of fear and xenophobia toward the rest of them on the part of many -- and almost certainly a growing number -- of persons among the populations that western civilization comprises. It is now at the point that a planeload of Englishmen -- real Englishmen -- will not fly with people who may be as english as them, but whose appearance is that of Pakistanis, Arabs and other islamic middle easterners.

Nor is there anything on the horizon likely to reverse any of this. We are not just sliding into war with them. We already have been at war with them for a long time. Go read the latest commentary by Arnaud de Borchgrave. It will give you all a somewhat better perspective.

I am certain the time will come when each Muslim in this country will have to choose between Islam and America, as the ones in Europe will have to make the same choice.

Ugly? You betcha. And certain to get a lot uglier. But ignoring all this is as foolish as it was for the Jews of Germany or the rest of Europe to try to pretend that the coming to power of Adolf Hitler in Germany was anything but the harbinger as well as the instrument of their coming destruction.

The clash of civilizations between the West and Islam is as real as the rising of the ocean levels of the world. Nothing any of you can say, or anything that George Bush can say, or all the islamic-american public relations councils can say, that will stop the stormwave now building over this. For Muslims in the west, for westerners, for everybody.

Arnold Harris
Mount Horeb WI

Arnold Harris
Mount Horeb WI
8.29.2006 5:45pm
Aziz (mail) (www):
I am certain the time will come when each Muslim in this country will have to choose between Islam and America, as the ones in Europe will have to make the same choice.

bollocks.
8.29.2006 5:47pm
Aziz (mail) (www):
Arnold - read this. hopefully that will convince you to go out and buy this.
8.29.2006 5:50pm
Dean Esmay:
This reminds me very much of conversations that used to take place telling Catholics that they'd have to choose between Rome and America. Indeed I once found a fascinating tract from 1904, opposing the re-election of Teddy Roosevelt because of his suspected Catholic sympathies. Not that TR was Catholic--he wasn't--but his refusal to denounce the Catholic side of his bloodline was reason enough to be suspicious of him and to oppose his continuation as President. The last time that was a serious issue was the 1960 election, although it's interesting that even since then we've only elected Protestants.
8.29.2006 6:01pm
John_B (mail) (www):
The point of assimilation isn't to accept all the values and behavior of the majority culture/civilization. It's to acknowledge that other people's views on things are as valid as your own, even if repugnant or obnoxious.

In some areas of law, the state has supremacy, no question about it. It can seem to ride roughshod over certain religious or moral or civil values, but it is done to preserve some very basic majoritarian or constitutional values.

As I noted, Female Genital Mutilation is simply not going to fly in the US, legally. Equally, even if your religion demands that you eat the brains of your ancestors, you can only do so by breaking a law.

But these are extreme examples. In most cases, some form of accommodation can be found, whether it's changing regulations to permit the wearing of a turban instead of a helmet, or wearing a beard when company policy prefers a clean-shaven look. The latter, though, can be demanded if safety or hygiene require it.

Prayer breaks can often be accommodated, but not always, particularly in production processes that cannot be interrupted easily.

In these cases, it's the individual (or his/her group) that needs to do the accommodating, perhaps by not seeking to work in particular jobs that place particular, unacceptable demands on behavior or attire.

But assimilation also requires the ability to understand that everything that happens that displeases or offends you is somehow directly targeted at you or your group. This is where CAIR goes sadly astray.
8.29.2006 6:42pm
urthshu (mail) (www):
I am certain the time will come when each Muslim in this country will have to choose between Islam and America

You know, Arnold, we wouldn't even be at that predictably unfortunate impasse if the muslims in America had, en masse, loudly rejected and condemned bin Laden at the time of 9/11 and kept on doing it. Instead all anyone heard was mealy-mouthed platitudes &bitching about 'rights', largely speaking. As if being muslim should grant special protections above &beyond those of ordinary Americans. And there was a noted reluctance to condemn him or other terrorists in no uncertain terms. Sorry to say it, but they've done it to themselves as a community.

And, yes Aziz, I know there were exceptions, thanks. Why, though, do I have to note that? What's wrong with that picture?
8.29.2006 8:08pm
Aziz (mail) (www):
if the muslims in America had, en masse, loudly rejected and condemned bin Laden at the time of 9/11 and kept on doing it

you are such a colossal idiot!!!
8.29.2006 11:19pm
urthshu (mail) (www):
Sure. Name-calling gets youor point across so well, Aziz. I don't recall doing that for you.

The thing is, in the popular imagination, what I said is in fact true. Yes, I'm aware there are exceptions, as I noted.

So shove it, Aziz.
8.30.2006 12:39am
Arnold Harris (mail):
Aziz, per your suggestion, I consulted the review of Jonah Blanks's book about your particular shi'a sec, the Daudi Bohras. The reviewer suggests that the limit of their assimilation to the cultures of western civilization is the point at which those cultures conflict with your particular daudi bohra shi'a interpretation of the commandments of Islam.

But I hope you understand this is exactly what a homogenizing culture such as that of the United States of America requires in order to make citizens and Americans out of immigrants and their offspring. It has happened with Germans, Swedes, Chinese, Irish, Jews, Croats, Greeks, Italians, Indians, Japanese, and on and on.

And if this is so, then I would have to ask you what any of your sect feel is so special about your culture or beliefs that you would want to perpetuate them indefinitely within a non-islamic land.

Or do you want want to endure another perpetual circumstance that is a handmaiden to the exclusivity that I have described above, in which members of the same Daudi Bohra sect get unceremoniously thrown off international flights because people fear to fly them?

In the long run, you can't have it both ways. You can be an American. Which sometimes requires a lot of extra work and patience in dealing with prejudiced fools. Or you can be anything else. Which means that in the end, your entire being will seethe with hatred against this society, its culture and its people.

Because you know as well as I do that is the end result of an "us vs them" mentality. Treat everyone else like the "goyim", and that's exactly what they will be.

I know this is difficult, and in a way, I feel sorry for you, your culture with its faraway roots that mean nothing to all the Americans, and the fact that this society, this culture, this civilization is obviously in long-term conflict with Islam, it political and religious manifestations, and no small number of its devotees.

By the way. Because of you and John Burgess, I picked up enough interest about shi'a Islam to read in some depth about the tragic but heroic story of the great Imam Hussein -- he of the martyrdom outside Kerbala. I always have celebrated bravery in personal conduct above most other virtues. Which enables me simultaneously to acknowledge the bravery of the jewish fighters in the Warsaw ghetto in April 1943, and the bravery of the last battalions of the Waffen SS defending Berlin in April 1945.

I think I understand the depth of emotion your co-religionists feel over that terrible incident, enough to shape their faith around Hussein and his struggle against stupid, fat, vainglorious and treacherous Yazid.

Would shi'a Islam permit a motion picture to be made of Hussein's life? or would that start just another religious war between your folks and the Sun'a? I think a lot more people around the world would understand your branch of Islam if such a film were made, and if it accurately projected shi's concepts of history, life and religion.

Arnold Harris
Mount Horeb WI
8.30.2006 4:28pm