For Esmay With Love and Squalor
Celia Farber
The freedom is paralyzing and I don't like it much. Dean handed me the secret code to the control room and dared me to write one single paragraph about anything at all. I think it was weeks or maybe months ago. I keep stalling. He knows I am frozen solid from 20 years of magazine journalism, which has given me a rich and properly traumatic life, but also made me spectacularly uptight about whether what I write possibly has whiskers that need clipping. You never know what people might say, not to mention women.
Magazine journalism is not to be dismissed but it is safe to say that the form teaches us to bind our true selves as tightly as Chinese maiden feet. (The Censor is frowning: "I'm not entirely clear what you mean by Chinese maiden feet.")
It was the rythms that started to drive me crazy, in the end--the rythms of the journalistic prose that were identical to all the rythms that had come before. They seemed to correspond to core grooves that existed in our minds, that had not and would not be perturbed, that somehow say: "I am the voice of reason. I am the voice of reason." Terribly ungenerous.
So.
Dean Esmay has been--for about a year-- inviting me to understand what blogging is, and to try it, and I have reacted like somebody who is asked to run naked down Broadway. Tonight he pressed me a bit harder, and actually made a case for the idea that if I write what I am really thinking and feeling it will not be a disaster.
But where is the EDITOR? Where is the HOOK? Where is the STORY?
And what if it isn't "working?"
Dean says not to worry. I can be myself.
Why?
You mean I can say anything I want?
Ok then. I'll tell you some things. The war I won't name (you denialist scumbags at Dean's World know what I mean) is raging all around, all sides being driven to screaming hysteria, lawsuits, e-rage, fire and brimstone accusations. I breathe shallowly and watch from a ditch, and dream of home.
Home is Sweden, where I grew up. I got a letter today from one of my closest friends, who's known me, as he likes to remind me, since I wrote my views straight onto my ripped jeans with a black Sharpie pen.
I swore I'd get home by midsummer (June 23) but I didn't make it. He said the gang was awaiting me expectantly and had plans to sink my laptop and cell phone into the Baltic sea under the dock on day one.
Then we would do as we always did; Start a fire, get the guitars, pour some schnapps, go pick wildflowers for the table (my job.) I kept writing cramped emails explaining that I was trapped in some kind of psychic warfare that made it impossible for me to do anything other than defend and survive--hammer out unending emails to an unyeilding universe. Gain one yard, get beaten back, advance again. A political existence, barren either way.
Our summer island is called Runmaro, and it is the gem of Stockholm's archipelago. Everybody was there, I hear, including Erik, who is never without his butterfly net, and who babysat our favorite poet Tomas Transtromer's butterfly collection on the island one summer. (This story has a subplot I won't reveal just yet but if you stay with me in my new incarnation as late night blogger, all will be revealed...)
So there I was, stiff with worry, sick with worry, over the war, the pogrom, the gangrenous infinity of it all.
And my friend wrote: "Erik told me that the Apollo butterfly has just been seen on Runmaro again!"
That is the famous butterfly that Mr. Transtromer wrote an ode to: "How I love that butterfly. As if it was a fluttering corner of Truth itself."
That's the story: The Apollo Butterfly Has Just Been Seen On Runmaro Again.
I was going to start posting hundreds of pages of data about who is Right and who is Wrong, but my soul went with that butterfly, and I decided he or she is a much better story.









since i am an unmitigated insomniac, i will be reading you often.
do you have any baskar dropa on your island?
i know it is not schnapps (better than schnapps!), but i raise a virtual glass to you tonight anyways.
i need it. ;)
[Celia: as anyone who has read my comments can attest, that's irony, of the pot-and-kettle variety. Welcome aboard!]
But then you realize no one really cares. That was true in the magazines, too, but they pay.
So, er, yeah. Welcome!
Sweden eh? I'm a big fan of Sweden, being that once was home to the Vikings - some of the fiercest people on the planet. In fact I suspect that their fire hasn't disappeared under socialism, smart furniture and Abba. The Swedes I've known were some of the toughest people I've met, comparable only to Australians.
In a barfight if a Swede or an Aussie has your back, you're going to win.
But I don't drink, hang out in bars, or fight with my fists anymore.
Just words. And Photoshop.
Välkommen!
Welcome aboard!
Hank Barnes
Welcome to DW, I'm sure you'll find us an accomodating lot.
Matoko-chan.
What pray tell is baskar dropa? Have you a link to this elixir you can share? You've managed to tweak my curiosity. I'm quite fond of Akhtamar (an Armenian brandy) which I've found is wonderfully bold and complex, able to hold it's own when mixed with soda, or clean the grease out of my pants when used straight.
Scott,
You forgot Poles. In my time in the service I saw a barfight or three (or maybe four), and particpated in one or two myself, and I learned a few things: Aussies have more scrap and toughness in 'em than any other people pound for pound, Swedes never seem to go down, Poles never seem to stay down, and don't hit the Shore Patrol even by accident - just because you're not a sailor doesn't mean they can't drag your green ass to the cooler.
Best regards,
Ken
We're going to be visiting Stockholm this summer - my husband wants to learn everything about the history of his family that doesn't include lutfisk. After reading your essay I'm more anxious than ever to visit. It sounds like a lovely place.
How did you guys manage those umlauts?
Dean, you done good again, old chap.
I'll be back later this evening to read more with a margarita in hand (classic on the rocks).
Were I more authentic I could tell you more...but I will have to consult my friend Urban, the aforementioned friend who gave us the news of the Apollo Butterfly. (I didn't name him previously.) (Can you just name people in blog posts without asking them? Are there rules?) I want to name all my beloved friends who constantly say funny things and tell me what's happening out there.
When Urban was in NY visiting me last, several years ago, my son arbitrarily re-named him "cone," and we have no idea why. Urban is easy to pronounce (rhymes with Sure and then rhymes with on.) Bah! Now I want to start posting pictures of all these people. How does one learn what is appropriate and what is not on the blogo-sphere? I suppose it's like the earliest days of answering machines? Taste and muturity somehow works itself out, over time?
ps. Swedish fish discussion toward the end, but emphasis on the dreaded Surstromming.
pss. I didn't write the last line!
my swedish friends bring it.
Runmaro?
Vast cutting room floor. Yep, that's the blogosphere!
I don't know about other people, but I cheat: I go to Windows Character Map (or Word, if I have it open already), select the characters I want, and paste them in. There are supposed to be key sequences for most accented and umlauted (is that a word?) characters; but I use them so seldom, I can't remember the key sequences. If I'm right, this should be an e with an umlaut: ë.
Of course, lots of times I'm lazy, and I skip the accents or the umlauts.
Although this could change, the blogosphere today is governed more by frontier etiquette than by legal codes. Yes, yes, the legal codes do apply here; but mostly nobody tries to enforce them in most places most of the time (as I strive to put the most qualifiers in the most possible places). If you think someone could be offended, you probably should ask first. If you don't think they'll mind, then don't bother with the sort of release process you would use in the magazines. If they complain, apologize politely and remove the offending information. Avoid posting too much identifying information about kids, because parents tend (rightly) to be more protective of their kids than of themselves. As long as you're not a jerk, most people won't mind.
One thing to keep in mind, though, is the size of your readership. My blog gets 70 people on a good day (except when Dean links me). Even if I'm a jerk on my blog, very few people will notice. Dean gets at least two orders of magnitude more readers than I do, and I'm sure it's three, maybe four. When you're a jerk here, it's pretty darn public. Your apologies, if called for, should be just as public and extra polite.
That's it exactly: taste and maturity. Add in humility when you're wrong, and you'll do fine. I would love to see your pictures from Sweden. I only got to visit there once, but your countrymen were extremely gracious to me. I remember it fondly.
1. If someone posts or comments anonymously, it's for a reason. As long as you don't know the reason to be fraud, you should respect it. Some people work in very political situations where their blog writing could cost them their livelihoods. I would rather not have the hassle of maintaining separate identities, so I blog under my real name. I figure any job I lose for my views is a job I was going to lose sooner or later anyway.
2. If you go too far and later decide to remove a post, remember: on the Internet, anything can last forever. There's always a chance that the original post lives on in some archive somewhere, and will turn up and embarass you later. That's why I think it's far more important to make the very public apology than to just remove the post. That way, the apology lasts forever, too.
I know people who would be willing to try blowfish, but they'd draw the line at Lutfisk. As far as culinary adventures go, it's the extreme.