Dean's World

Defending the liberal tradition in history, science, and philosophy.

English As America's Official Language

I just wanted to comment on the U.S. Senate's approval on Thursday to make English the official language of the United States for federal services. It now goes to the U.S. House of Representatives to work out differences in the proposal. I say it's a good move by the U.S. Senate, and long overdue. I wouldn't emigrate to, say, Japan, and then arrogantly expect to be catered to in English. I'd work hard to learn Japanese. Too bad the U.S. Senate killed the amendment opposing amnesty-in-thin-disguise for illegal immigrants though, on Wednesday.

Posted by Shay | Permalink | Technorati Trackbacks
Jesse Hill (mail):
A country divided by two languages cannot stand. I think the senate did the right thing.
5.20.2006 5:54pm
Dean Esmay:
There's a real danger in something like this, which is that it could later on down the road spark a movement to recognize a "second official language," or cause some states to rebel against it and install a second or third official language into their state laws.

I mention this because there have been states within the union which were officially bilingual; Louisiana was once officially French and English, and Pennsylvania was once officially Dutch and English, and neither gave up their second languages until the 20th century if I recall right (I know Pennsylvania didn't drop Dutch as an official state language until the 1950s or so).

I can see some state like California, in reaction to the Federal government, declaring that English and Spanish are the official two languages of California. Then the whole country's in an uproar trying to accomodate California, just like all of Canada bends over backwards to accomodate Quebec.

And it's just the sort of thing Californians would do, too.
5.20.2006 6:20pm
Nicholas V. (mail) (www):
Actually the "Dutch" in Pennsylvania is more closely related to "Deutsch" - i.e. German - than it is to what we call Dutch today. For example:

Wikipedia article

As you may recall many of the "original" immigrants to what would become the USA were German and it seems many of them settled in Pennsylvania. I believe when it came time to decide what language would be spoken, German only lost out in second place by a small margin. Although, American history is not my strong subject.
5.20.2006 6:31pm
Dave Schuler (mail) (www):
The measure goes a little further than that, Dean: it declares that there is no affirmative right to receive services in languages other than English, except where required by federal law. That would appear to me to preclude the kinds of by-state multiple official language situation that you've laid out.

Most interesting is that without exception prospective Democratic presidential candidates in 2008 voted against the measure. There was one Republican vote against the measure: Domenici (R-NM) and I presume that local political triangulation influenced that vote.
5.20.2006 6:34pm
Dean Esmay:
Dave: I guess I'd have to read the language of the proposed statute. It would surprise me if it were able to preclude states from recognizing and requiring use of two languages for state laws, state courts, etc. I'm not sure the 10th amendment is quite that dead yet, is it?
5.20.2006 6:47pm
Dave Schuler (mail) (www):
Here's a link to the text of the bill. The site I've linked to is Sam Hayakawa's old organization's site, BTW.
5.20.2006 6:56pm
Vic Stein (mail):
We've got along pretty darn well without any of this official language nonsense, but apparently, because this is a hot issue, we need to pass more vanity bills. People learn English because you can't get ahead in our society without it: it's a "law" based in economics, not showboating. Every other immigrant group has done it just fine, and there's every evidence that Mexicans are doing just fine too.
5.20.2006 7:32pm
Xrlq (mail) (www):
Dean: I wouldn't worry about California getting funny over English as an official national language. English has been the official language of that state since the mid-1980s, and voters overwhelmingly banned "bilingual" (first language retention) education in 1998.
5.20.2006 7:47pm
Xrlq (mail) (www):
It would surprise me if it were able to preclude states from recognizing and requiring use of two languages for state laws, state courts, etc. I'm not sure the 10th amendment is quite that dead yet, is it?


Depends. The Tenth Amendment is an all-or-nothing rule. If you think that Congress has no power to declare English the language of the U.S., then your argument is that Congress has exceeded its enumerated powers, and the bill is unconstitutional whether it preempts state law or not. Conversely, if you think Congress has that power, as I'm tempted to argue it does, then the Supremacy Clause clearly allows the federal law to trump state law, and the Tenth Amendment will play no role in the analysis whatsoever. In that case, it's just a question of interpretation; was the law intended to preempt inconsistent state laws.
5.20.2006 7:53pm
Arnold Harris (mail):
My wife Stefi, whose native language was Croatian, had to learn English the hard way when she came to this country to study at the UI-Chicago.

Nobody gave her a break, and the kinds of jobs was able to get until she actually learned how to communicate in Chicagoese, involved slinging hash at this greasy spoon. Including one run by an immigrant Greek who cheated on her wages, until I called the bastard one day and threated to bring the law down on his ass. (He paid her what she was due, without further bullshit..)

And the both of us spent a couple of years or so in Europe and the Middle East. We weren't travelling like rich tourists, so we had to learn how to shop for groceries and stuff the way the people of Israel, Greece, Italy, Germany, Austria and Portugal do it. One when we in Croatia, with her family, did we have any kind of linguistic and familial social cushion.

So let these mexican folks show us all how bright they are in learning English. It's not much. It's bastardized German, Danish, Norman French, Latin, and a little of this and that from maybe dozens of other languages. But it's ours, and that's all anybody needs to know.

Arnold Harris
Mount Horeb WI
5.20.2006 8:44pm
Mike (mail):
As Dave said, the Dutch were in Nieuw Amsterdam (I think I got the spelling right) or what became New York after those stinkin' beef-eatin' sheep-botherin' English came along and took it from them! Those Dutch, can't trust 'em, you know, those low-down, dirty, wooden-shoe wearin' Roosevelts? ;)

The Pennsylvania Dutch were Germans. You know, those low-down,... ;)

Ah, for the time when each colony loathed the others. Good times, good times!

Of course, my dad went to school in Saginaw, and the farm kids bussed in from the outlying villges, some spoke German in the home, and even had a slight accent. Funny how seventy years pass in this land and things change so dramatically.
5.20.2006 8:51pm
Mike (mail):
As an aside Dean, if Congress starts tying Federal funding to an English-only requirement then English it will be. It works with education and highway bills.

The tenth amendment is remarkably flexible when Federal funds are involved.
5.20.2006 8:54pm
Jesse Hill (mail):
Vic:

Maybe you should spend some time here in Los Angeles before you make a statement like that.
5.20.2006 9:16pm
John_B (mail) (www):
Florida became really difficult in the late 70s, early 80s. It was very hard to find city or county employees in several places who were willing to speak English to English-speaking clients. That led to an "English is the Official language of the State" law in the late 80s.
5.20.2006 9:43pm
Scott Kirwin (mail) (www):
The local Lowes has gone completely bilingual. All signs are in English and Spanish, and aren't all that easy to read since the fonts and sizes are exactly the same.

It's extremely frustrating when you are searching for something then get distracted by attempting to discern whether what you are reading is information you understand or not.

In Japan it was easier to either "tune-out" the Japanese characters and kana or tune them in.
5.20.2006 10:17pm
Jerry Kindall (www):
A country divided by two languages cannot stand.

Lots of countries have more than one language in common use by a substantial minority of the population. In Spain, 7 million people speak Catalan or Valencian (languages so related that they are considered dialects). Another three million speak Galician, which is more like Portuguese than Castillian Spanish -- which is only spoken by about 75% of Spain's population, by the way. Then there are Basque, Asturian, and Extremaduran, which boast between 200,000 and 600,000 speakers. In Germany, there are ten million people who can understand Low Saxon (though few speakers) and two million who speak Upper Saxon. In France you get Auvergnat, Breton, Corsican, and others, plus spillovers from Germany and Spain (Alemannisch and Catalan). There are one million Italian speakers in France. Then of course in the British Isles you've got your Scots and Gaelic -- as much as 30% of the population of Scotland speaks Scots. And of course, there's Canada.

These countries do not seem to have much trouble standing.

I don't really understand why Americans feel so threatened by Spanish. It's an easy language to learn (much, much easier than English), often beautiful, fun to speak once you get the hang of the Rs the Ts and catch the rhythm, and it has quite a rich literary history. The southwestern United States and Florida are full of Spanish place names that are quite fun to know the meanings of (e.g. Boca Raton = Mouse Mouth) and that evidence the intermingling of the Spanish language with the United States throughout its history. Why are people forgetting that? There's nothing wrong with Spanish and there's certainly nothing wrong with a little Spanish being spoken in the United States, either. Remember that the next time you order a Disney movie on DVD from "Buena Vista" ("Good View") Home Entertainment. It doesn't get much more American than Disney, does it?
5.21.2006 2:36am
Xrlq (mail) (www):
The tenth amendment is remarkably flexible when Federal funds are involved.


More than flexible; try irrelevant. The Tenth Amenmdent only prohibits Congress from exceeding its enumerated powers, and courts have ruled that the tax and spend power is a separate, enumerated power of Congress. Thus, if federal funds are involved there is no Tenth Amendment issue, period.
5.21.2006 12:43pm
John Anderson (mail):
This comes up from time to time over the decades here in Li`l Rhody: last I noticed, things like the driver license exams were in some seven languages. The usual idea (which I support) is to make [American] English the official language but retain translations (and translation services, eg in hospitals) as well. Hardly a new idea: for centuries, the RC Church held [vulgate?] Latin as its official language while using Italian, French, etc. as convenient --- often drafting contracts, treaties, and such in a current tongue until agreement was reached, then translating into the Latin for the official document.
5.21.2006 3:46pm
Bill Dooley:
To a degree far greater than I've ever seen in the last 40 years or so, the far left is pressing every opportunity to create and take advantage of divisions in the population. One aspect of the plan is that they vehemently oppose even the suggestion of cultural assimilation. It's identity politics in the extreme. I see Official English as a way of putting a stop to laws requiring the use of multiple languages.

Humanitarian exceptions should be made for criminal proceedings and medical care. So-called bilingual education is a crock designed to frustrate assimilation.
5.21.2006 4:16pm
Jesse Hill (mail):
I don't really understand why Americans feel so threatened by Spanish.


Here's what it comes down to, anc you can call it racist if you want to, but it isn't:

It's our damned country, that's why.

I have nothing against immigration -- Spanish or otherwise -- but part of becoming an American is learning English, just like every other immigrant before them. That's part of cultural assimilation, and cultural assimilation is especially important here in the States because we don't want to end up like France.

Amercians are generally very open and happy to have immigrants here... as long as they learn to speak the language and don't expect US to adjust to THEM.

Get it?
5.21.2006 5:42pm
mikeca (mail) (www):
Xrlq is correct that California passed a ballot measure making English the official language and another ballot measure banning bi-lingual education. On the bi-lingual education issue, everyone in California (except for perhaps the bi-lingual teachers) agreed that bi-lingual education was a complete failure in California. The measure had substantial support in the Hispanic community, because they were the ones most directly affected by the failure.

In spite of this, the driver’s license test and ballot pamphlets, which explain all the propositions on the ballot every year, are available in ten or more languages. Making English the official language, doesn’t forbid people to speak other languages.

What I think is driving this issue, is that Hispanics, whether legal or illegal, are starting to spread beyond the border states and the east and west coast. They are starting to move into large and medium size communities in the Midwest and South. Suddenly, people who have lived in communities were everyone spoke English all their lives are starting to hear people speaking Spanish at the supermarket or mall. That is what has made illegal aliens suddenly a big crises and what drives the English as an official language movement.
5.21.2006 7:22pm
mariner:
Vid,

People learn English because you can't get ahead in our society without it:


Where do you live?

It is quite possible to live a lifetime in this country without being able to read, write or speak English.

It's easier in some places than others (California, Texas and Florida come to mind) but the phenomenon is not limited to those states.
5.21.2006 8:36pm
mariner:
Jerry,

I don't really understand why Americans feel so threatened by Spanish.



A better question would be why Mexican immigrants (among others) are so threatened by English. After all, they're demanding to live in our country, not the other way around.
5.21.2006 8:41pm