Friday, February 22, 2008
Long Live The "War on Terror"
by Dave Price
What Hirsh and other post-liberty liberals seem incapable of grasping is that the practice of terrorizing people with violence for purposes of controlling them is the same unethical use of force that defines totalitarians of any stripe, from Nazis to Communists to Baathists to Islamofascists. That is why Bush correctly says that terrorists are the heirs to the ideologies we defeated in the 20th century, and that is why the war or terror remains the "transcendant" challenge for a nation founded on the principle "that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness."
And may we stay at war with terror till no human is subject to denial of these rights by terrorists.
Monday, February 11, 2008
A Rolling Meme Gathers No Facts
by Dave Price
Via Glenn, yet more evidence of the antiwar disconnect from reality, in an article on the Dems' inability to turn over Iraq to terrorists and militias:
Force a showdown, in other words, and use any means necessary to get the bloodshed ended.After the events of the last year, does any serious person really think the withdrawal of American troops would lead to less bloodshed in Iraq? Of course, this is only Rolling Stone, which lately is a sort of glossy left-wing NewsMax, but I bet you could find a half-dozen calls for intervention in Darfur or elsewhere on precisely the opposite reasoning in the same magazine.
But what exactly are these young idealists campaigning for?Indeed, that's exactly what they should be asking themselves. "Peace" is not Al Qaeda safe havens all over the Sunni triangle.
What really worries me is that these are the Obama supporters, and while I hold out a lot of hope that events on the ground and a general election campaign will force a significant moderation of his views on Iraq, his current views and advisers are troubling.
It's been over 30 years since we elected a peace-at-any-cost President, and we and the Iranians are still paying the price today. Let's hope Iraqis will not have to spend the next 30 years under the thumb of terrorists because we make the same mistake twice.
Monday, February 4, 2008
Is This Why Hugo Chavez Fears U.S. Invasion?
by Dave Price
Apparently oil isn't enough to pay for the socialist revolution, as they are now turning to narcotics trafficking.
The varied testimonies I have heard reveal that the co-operation between Venezuela and the guerrillas in transporting cocaine by land, air and sea is both extensive and systematic. Venezuela is also supplying arms to the guerrillas, offering them the protection of their armed forces in the field, and providing them with legal immunity de facto as they go about their giant illegal business.If this is true, perhaps Chavez' fear of U.S. military intervention is not entirely groundless, as Manuel Noriega could attest.
Of course, we could end all the narco-states and put these violent merchants out of business tomorrow by eliminating the laws that create their 10,000% profit margins.
Thursday, January 31, 2008
How The Drug War Might End
by Dave Price
Jury nullification.
Jury nullification is a de facto and traditional power of juries, not normally disclosed to jurors by the system when they are instructed as to rights and duties. The power of jury nullification derives from an inherent quality of most modern common law systems—a general unwillingness to inquire into jurors' motivations during or after deliberations. A jury's ability to nullify the law is further supported by two common law precedents: the prohibition on punishing jury members for their verdict, and the prohibition on retrying defendants after an acquittal; and the constitutional prohibition on retrying criminal defendants (see related topics res judicata and double jeopardy).This argues that the government must go to great lengths to ensure that use of illegal drugs is stigmatized so that juries do not nullify, and also hope that juries are generally unaware of their power to nullify.
....
Nevertheless, there is little doubt as to the ability of a jury to nullify the law.
...
Nullification in practice
Nullification has a mixed history in the United States. Jury nullification appeared in the pre-Civil War era when juries occasionally refused to convict for violations of the Fugitive Slave Act. However, during the Civil Rights era, all-white juries were known to refuse to convict white defendants for the murder of blacks.[13] During Prohibition, juries often nullified alcohol control laws,[14] possibly as often as 60% of the time.[15] This resistance is considered to have contributed to the adoption of the Twenty-first amendment repealing the Eighteenth amendment which established Prohibition.
I don't think people should abuse illegal drugs, but the "cure" of curtailing our rights and using the State to violently incarcerate those who choose to ingest illegal drugs appears to be significantly worse than the disease.
UPDATE: Of relevance: Glenn Reynolds' essay on jury nullification. Very interesting story of how incredibly mistreated early juries were.
UPDATE: The Washington Times surely intends this as a slight against Obama, but it's one reason why I would have to give him serious consideration if he becomes the nominee (of course, he would also to have moderate significantly on issues like supporting the nascent democracy in Iraq). (via James Taranto, who also presumably intends it as a slight)
Tuesday, January 29, 2008
Why I won't raise my daughters in Pakistan
by Aziz P
Zack Ajmal looks at the data, and I add my own two cents.
Monday, January 28, 2008
Late-Term Abortion
by Dave Price
The wages of socialism:
Doctors are calling for NHS treatment to be withheld from patients who are too old or who lead unhealthy lives.This is the fundamental conflict between coercive equality (everyone must have access to the same health care) and personal freedom.
Smokers, heavy drinkers, the obese and the elderly should be barred from receiving some operations, according to doctors, with most saying the health service cannot afford to provide free care to everyone.
The inevitable result of socialist health care is that there must be rationing, because you cannot provide unlimited health care with limited funds, and since there is rationing there must be rules for how rationing is done. They probably won't make eating a Big Mac a crime -- but they might refuse to treat you if you keep eating them, making the punishment a de facto death sentence.
And we'll all be old someday.
Saturday, January 26, 2008
Soviet For A Day
by Dave Price
Lest we forget:
AN adventure park offers a journey back to the Soviet Union with KGB interrogation methods and "beatings" with a leather belt.Odd, but I think this says a lot about how far the former Soviet republics have come. The only thing missing is an animatronic Dan Rather telling them how much better off they are than Americans, and perhaps a Pulitzer-winning Walter Duranty essay breathlessly extolling their socialist utopia.
The 1984 Soviet Union theme park is located outside the Lithuanian capital Vilnius in an old bunker which served as a secret TV station in case of a nuclear attack.
At the conclusion of the tour, visitors receive a special certificate to honour their two hours as "Soviet citizens" and a shot of vodkaNaturally.
(Via GeekPress)
Thursday, January 24, 2008
Liberty's Lucre
by Dave Price
John Stossel:
"I think one of the best kept secrets is that the world is in the midst of an economic boom, and it is largely driven by increases in economic freedom," says economics professor James Gwartney, director of the Stavros Center for the Advancement of Free Enterprise and Economic Education at Florida State University. "The world has become more free, and, at the same time, growth is soaring to new highs. During 1995 to 2005, the growth rate of per capita GDP in 99 countries for which data are available has increased to 2.2 percent, nearly twice the rate of recent decades. Since 2000, the annual growth rate of per capita GDP has been even more rapid, 3.2 percent."Freedom isn't just a pretty word or a fun way to be, or even just the most moral state of affairs. It's also the best way to make life better for people.
And life is getting better faster for a lot of people.
(Via Hit & Run)
Sunday, January 13, 2008
"It's My Bloody Right To Do So"
by Dave Price
Damned right.
"I reserve the right to do exactly what they've accused me of doing."This is what freedom means.
UPDATE: Bryan Costin comments:
As CS Lewis said, "Of all tyrannies, a tyranny exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It may be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end, for they do so with the approval of their own conscience."
Friday, January 11, 2008
Genocide By Any Other Name
by Dave Price
While I sympathize with Israel's plight and believe they are generally the wronged party, I have to disagree with Naftali's statement. Not all criticisms of a "disproportionate response" are valid, but while one should be prepared for annihilation in war, that does not mean that annihilation is ever justified, even if done in the name of self-defense.
Willow is right: these kinds of statements are barbaric, irrational, wrong, and counter to the philosophies of tolerance and universal human rights that are the foundation of liberal democracy. Enemies should be defeated, but making friends of those enemies should be our ultimate goal, as our grandfathers did in Germany and Japan and our fathers did in Eastern Europe and Asia.
Anyone calling for genocide by any name under any circumstances should be ashamed. And if you're a Christian, you ought to be doubly ashamed, as Christ teaches us to turn the other cheek, not burn our enemies' cities to the ground with their families inside.
Related Posts (on one page):
- Genocide By Any Other Name
- An Interesting Discussion
- Extremists Among Us
Monday, December 31, 2007
Freedom Rising In Iraq
by Dave Price
Democracy, whisky, sexy, party!
"The security has changed and it took us by surprise. We're very happy. Especially us young people," said al-Azzawi, a 22-year-old student taking a break from dancing to a traditional Iraqi band in the ballroom of the Palestine Hotel.And in an older story, a telling quote as the BBC tours Ameriyah, courtesy of our old friend Abul Abed
"I haven't seen a happy place like this in so long. I wanted to see if I could maybe meet a few girls!" he said. "I only hope the Iraqi people can enjoy more happy times like this."
Salah al-Lami, 27, the singer who performed at the Palestine ballroom and then for another New Year's Eve crowd at the Sheraton Hotel across the street, said it was the first time he had sung before a live audience in four years.
This new attitude is at the heart of the sahwa "awakening" movement, and probably has a lot to do with the vastly greater freedom of information transfer that has developed in Iraq since 2003. There are thousands of independent (if partisan) Iraqi media, and there are one hundred times as many cell phones as there were under Saddam. While thugs of various stripe still lurk around every corner, threatening journalists and civilians alike, they no longer have the iron grip over communications they had under Saddam. This new ability to communicate with each other has helped Iraqis to overcome the false propaganda of extremists and establish a more accurate consensus reality around which moderate positions can be built, and as these moderate movements grow in strength and credibility, they are beginning to enable Iraqis to live something resembling a decent, free life.
Their leader, Abul Abed, meets the Americans every day.
On the wall is a picture of him with General David Petraeus, the top US commander in Iraq.
"At the beginning, people saw it as an occupation which had to be resisted. But then they saw that the Americans were working in the interests of the people."
Wednesday, December 19, 2007
This Is Torture
by Dave Price
This isn't running water over the heads of three senior terrorists for a few minutes to get information. This is real torture, indiscriminately applied to repress and terrify civilians. Not for the squeamish.
...they also found bloody swords and knives... there are a number of body parts and skulls littered all around this property...Sadly, even as our soldiers work to shut down these horrors, much of the world seems to think this is what we're doing in Iraq, Afghanistan, and Guantanamo Bay, thanks in large part to the hysterical rhetoric of the Western Left — which then blames Bush for our unpopularity.
Monday, December 17, 2007
More Repression In Iran
by Dave Price
Dog bites man.
TEHRAN (Reuters) - Iranian police have closed down 24 Internet cafes and other coffee shops in as many hours, detaining 23 people, as part of a broad crackdown on immoral behavior in the Islamic state, official media said on Sunday.So much for the long-awaited "Queer Eye For The Straight Guy: Tehran" episode. Grand Theft Auto: Vice City also appears to be a felony, which is ironic on so many levels.
The action in Tehran province was the latest move in a campaign against fashion and other practices deemed incompatible with Islamic values, including women flouting strict dress codes and barber shops offering men Western hair styles.
"Using immoral computer games, storing obscene photos ... and the presence of women wearing improper hijab were among the reasons why they have been closed down," Colonel Nader Sarkari, a provincial police commander, said.I like our Nader better.
Thursday, December 13, 2007
Altering Sexuality
by Dean
Also via Instapundit comes this thorny shocker.
We may have a "cure" for homosexuality in the not too distant future. This of course totally flies in the face of religious people who fulminatingly insist that homosexuality is 'against nature' (bulls***, it's found all over nature in countless species) but it also flies in the face of gay rights activists who insist that homosexuality is an "immutable trait" like race (which I've been telling my friends in the gay community for almost 20 years is a really foolish position to take).
So, when--and it's no longer an "if"--we have a drug that can turn gay people straight, is it going to become okay to discriminate against gays? Or mandate that they get "treatment?"
(FWIW, I've been a staunch advocate for gay rights since well before it was popular. Trying to read anything into my motives for posting these questions is a total waste of your time and I'd encourage against trying. Just address the data and the actual questions I pose, please.)
Related Posts (on one page):
- Statement
- Altering Sexuality
Friday, December 7, 2007
21st century Pharoah
by Aziz P
The rulers of Dubai are erecting grand monuments for the 21st century, with 19th century labor. Unlike the knee-jerk xenophobia against Dubai expressed by Hillary Clinton and other Democrats, this is a valid critique of the Emirates founded on genuine human rights - and their transgressions are ones we, as consumers, aid and abet.
Related Posts (on one page):
- 21st century Pharoah
Thursday, December 6, 2007
The Mystery of Capital
by Dave Price
Why are poor countries poor?
A commenter's reference to "dead capital" reminded me of DeSoto's excellent book on the subject, which had a profound impact on me when I read it several years ago. Here's an essay from DeSoto that captures the point nicely:
Walk down most roads in the Middle East, the former Soviet Union, or Latin America, and you will see many things: houses used for shelter; parcels of land being tilled, sowed, and harvested; merchandise being bought and sold. Assets in developing and former communist countries primarily serve these immediate physical purposes. In the West, however, the same assets also lead a parallel life as capital outside the physical world. They can be used to put in motion more production by securing the interests of other parties as "collateral" for a mortgage, for example, or by assuring the supply of other forms of credit and public utilities.Read the whole thing.
...
The lack of legal property thus explains why citizens in developing and former communist nations cannot make profitable contracts with strangers and cannot get credit, insurance, or utilities services: they have no property to lose. Because they have no legal property, they are taken seriously as contracting parties only by their immediate family and neighbors. People with nothing to lose are trapped in the grubby basement of the precapitalist world.
In his book, DeSoto shows the incredibly strong positive correlation between GDP per capita and well-defined, well-regulated mechanisms for collateralization and capital transfer. The statistic that stuck with me was one about the impoverished nation of Haiti, where, after all the bribes and forms and required permissions from various departments, it takes on average fourteen years to transfer ownership of real estate.
Imagine for a moment you are trying to sell your home, and you have to warn potential buyers that it will probably take a decade and a half before title can be transferred; it would obviously be a huge disincentive, and many potential transactees could not even expect to survive the length of the transaction. It's easy to see how the prevalence of this kind of barrier could cause an economy to grind to a halt.
In poor countries, the net result of this is to reduce the transferable value of the main asset of the poorest — their homes — to near-zero. Imagine the effect on the United States if all property values in America suddenly dropped 99%, and you'll begin to understand what a crushing burden this "dead capital" inflicts on poor countries.
Of course, this also means that if efficient capital-releasing mechanisms can be established in poor countries, it's highly likely they can become wealthy. As we help newly liberated Iraqis and Afghanis toward self-sufficiency, this provides hope they will be able to build the kind of prosperity (long taken for granted here in the West) that helps establish stability and security, if these lessons are properly applied.
Tuesday, November 27, 2007
Wolf At The Door
by Dave Price
This snarky update by Glenn made me laugh. And he's right, of course.
Gun rights are something I rarely if ever blog about, but I'm glad others do. The individual's right to arms is a necessary final line of defense against government oppression.
Friday, November 23, 2007
Do Wealthy Liberal Democracies Fail?
by Dave Price
This doesn't sound good:
"He who says he supports Chavez but votes 'no' is a traitor, a true traitor," the president told an arena packed with red-clad supporters. "He's against me, against the revolution and against the people."In the past, such statements have been the prelude to some of the worst democides in history.
The proposed revisions would do away with presidential term limits, extend terms from six to seven years, let Chavez appoint regional vice presidents and eliminate Central Bank authority, among other changes.Venezuela could be the first relatively wealthy free democracy to fall into dictatorship in a long time, perhaps the first ever at this income level.
Critics warn he would also have the power to shut down Venezuelan newspapers, television and radio stations by declaring a state of emergency, and the government could detain citizens without charges during such a period.
Of course, arguably democracy has already fallen, since Chavez almost certainly stole the last election.
This vote happens on Dec 2nd, a day that may live in infamy. I haven't been able to find out if they're still using the same voting machine technology they did last time, or whether the election monitors have changed their audit procedures, but I am not optimistic.
Chavez insists he will only stay on as long as Venezuelans continue to vote for him.Or at least as long as he can keep up the pretense that they are.
Tuesday, November 20, 2007
High Time For Medical Marijuana?
by Dave Price
Well, this certainly alters the debate:
Marijuana Cuts Lung Cancer Tumor Growth In Half, Study ShowsIt's been well-established for some time that marijuana does not cause cancer, at least not at anything near the rate of tobacco, but the idea it actually reduces lung cancer is pretty astounding.
ScienceDaily (Apr. 17, 2007) — The active ingredient in marijuana cuts tumor growth in common lung cancer in half and significantly reduces the ability of the cancer to spread, say researchers at Harvard University who tested the chemical in both lab and mouse studies.
Hmmm, maybe I need to consider doing more personal cancer-fighting, though perhaps one recreational cancer-suppressing drug is enough.
Via Dilbertblog, where Scott Adams has an amusing cannabis fact sheet.
UPDATE: Interesting discussion in the comments at Ace's.
Monday, November 5, 2007
What Do Feminists Believe?
by Trudy W. Schuett
There's a good discussion going on at A Woman for Men's Rights on what feminists believe they're about (across several posts, BTW.)
I've stayed out of it, mostly because I've been working & playing catch-up in other areas, and there just hasn't been time. I do want to point out, though, that in the past few months I've been doing some research on feminism in spare moments, and have discovered that inexplicably, the deeper I dig, the less I find.
I've got some time off coming up, so I'll explain that last in greater detail down the road.
Friday, November 2, 2007
American Taliban?
by Dave Price
Yesterday's Going Green post provoked this insight from Dean's World commenter TimKindred:
Our entire outlook upon drugs is no different than that of the Taliban towards women. They want women clothed from head to foot, cap-a-pie, as it were, to prevent the men from lusting after the women. That completely removes the sense of personal responsibility from the equation. It says that men are by nature weal, and unable to control themselves when in the presence of a woman. That's bullsh!t and anyone with more than 2 brain cells understands that.It's probably always a mistake to limit everyone's freedom because some people supposedly can't be expected to manage their own lives responsibly.
However, we treat drugs in the same manner. We tell adults that they may NOT have them because they cannot be trusted to act responsibly.
Thursday, November 1, 2007
Going Green
by Dave Price
Glenn has a great little video piece by Drew Carey on medical marijuana.
One particularly interesting interviewee is Bill Leahy, who runs a printing businss: "I am a hawk, I mean, I'm a right-wing, I volunteered to go to Vietnam, I joined the service, I've always been a Republican. I'm very, for law and order, right and wrong, right to have my guns..." He talks about having Marfan's syndrome, and how cannabis relieves the pain of his disease.
Really, I can't understand how anyone can reasonably oppose medical marijuana, given what we now know about the herb. Forcing people to turn to drug dealers to get the most effective medicine for their condition is just unconscionable. And you can't convince me there isn't a better law enforcement use for our tax dollars than breaking down the doors of medical marijuana clinics.
Sadly, as best I can tell the major Presidential candidates in both parties seem to be on the wrong side of this issue.
UPDATE: Ah, apparently the Dem candidates are significantly better, with most of them agreeing that the raids, at least, should be ended. Giuliani and the other Republican candidates have said the raids would continue under their administrations.
Thursday, October 25, 2007
Free
by Dave Price
Via NRO, schoolkids get an unexpected lesson about repression and the yearning for freedom:
The class was at Brown Bay with V.I. National Park Education Specialist Laurel Brannick during V.I. Coastweeks in September when a man wearing flip flops, a bathing suit and a baseball hat suddenly appeared on the beach.He'll probably go back once he sees a couple Michael Moore documentaries and realizes he's forsaken that wonderful free Cuban health care for a heartless warmongering capitalist hellhole.
...
“In broken English, he asked us where he was and if this was St. John,” said Brannick. “When we told him it was, he almost started to cry. He was saying, ‘I’m free!’ and giving us the thumbs up.”
...
Lopez was able to relay his story to a Spanish-speaking student in the class. The Cuban immigrant traveled to St. Maarten, then Tortola via a boat. He then blew up an inflatable kayak he brought with him from Cuba and paddled toward St. John.
“It got a couple holes in it, so he ditched it when he got close to St. John and just swam in,” said Brannick. “He told us he’s a pharmacist, but he had no future in Cuba. He said we were his guardian angels.”
Monday, October 22, 2007
The Best system in the world.
by Andrew Cory
Most of you have probably seen this "Falling numbers of state dentists in England has led to some people taking extreme measures, including extracting their own teeth, according to a new study released Monday."
This has lead many of us Americans to pat ourselves on the back, congratulating ourselves on our high quality of dentistry. After all, in our country of pay-for-play dentistry, we have plenty of dentists. And we never have to pull our own teeth...
Well: I got an Email this morning, from a friend here in the US: "I just saved myself about $300 last night, albeit painfully. I pulled a good chunk of my own wisdom tooth out, by hand. Yep. I'm that stupid. Or rather, I was that desperate to break off the shard that kept cutting my tongue and mouth up all night, and happened to have some prescription motrin laying around still, to dull the massive pain that came afterwards."
Does she have insurance? Of course she does. Can she afford to use it? Not even a little. Still: Good to know that we Americans have the best health care in the world!
Wednesday, October 17, 2007
A Brief Response to Ali Eteraz
by Dave Price
I've enjoyed the well-thought-out Islamic Reform series, and kudos on the accompanying bio photography. Ali cuts quite a dramatic, erudite and photogenic figure, everything one could hope for in the spokesman for a liberal Islam -- a Che for our time, sans the bloody hands and bloodier ideology.
But I have to chuckle a bit at his surprise at the opposition that forming a secular "Islamic left" has engendered.
It is as if people cannot conceive of Islams that are other than ideological.Indeed.
Here in the West, since the 19th century the left has gradually become less concerned with the rationalist, post-Christian-statist liberalism, embodied by people like Thomas Paine, that idealized individual liberty and fueled suffrage and the end of slavery, and is instead increasingly defined by the struggle for social equality, through socialist government action both ethnic (affirmative action) and economic (welfare). Central to this effort has been the establishment of ethnic identity advocacy organizations for "disadvantaged" groups, and the enshrining of each ethnicity's allegedly intrinsic values as equal or superior to our Western values. Consequently, any effort to "secularize" Islam, even originating within Islam, smacks of neocolonialism, and is seen by many on the left as imposing those dusty old Western classical liberal values (which in their eyes, are at best no better than any native values) on the sacred Other, which must be preserved at all costs (I like to call this last bit of xenophilic narcissism the "academic tourist’s mentality" -- we need to keep all these lovely cultures around so we can study their outlandish ceremonies, rituals, customs, and clothing, and fete them as superior at dinner parties and academic conferences, thus demonstrating our personal moral superiority through our open-minded cultural humility; never mind the practical matter of whether said peoples, who usually live in abject poverty with few rights, might be far better off under, and indeed sometimes clamoring for, liberal democracy).
Secularism for me, but not for thee; the former is obviously desirable as an enhancement of my freedom, the latter is not who you are.
Finally, Ali is very correct about the “Iran problem” – democracy is, as Hayek noted, not an ultimate good in and of itself but rather merely one mechanism by which the ultimate desired end – liberty – can be preserved. A democracy in which a cabal of any stripe – be they Fascist, Communist, Islamist, or Christianist – exercises ultimate control is very unlikely to be liberal, as the last 500 years amply demonstrates. And as one reflects on Iran’s problems and contemplates a “Muslim left” to oppose them, one must keep in mind it was the American left through Carter that allowed the mullahcrats in Iran to seize the country in the first place, and so badly misjudged the revolutionaries' intentions that they predicted that in our time the Ayatollah would be remembered as a saint.
I look forward to the final chapter in the series.
Tuesday, October 16, 2007
Deploying Guardsman Targeted by OK Child Support Collectors
by Trudy W. Schuett
Nevermind he's got a setup for automatic payroll deduction payment to TWO ex-wives. Here's more:
Whitlock said he went to KiBois on his own, because he wanted to report that he would no longer be getting his McAAP check once he reported for duty, but instead would be getting a check for his National Guard service.
“That’s why I went down,” he said. “I didn’t want to get behind. When my check at McAAP stopped and I got my Army check, they could deduct it.”
As proof of his lower income while he’s in the National Guard, Whitlock said he brought along a chart given to guardsmen which shows them how to figure their pay by computing their years of service with their rank.
It shows that an E-4, such as Whitlock, with 18 years of service is paid $2,062.80 a month — which is less than his McAAP pay.
Whitlock also has a letter from his commander, Capt. Cameron C. Lehanhan.
“Purpose of this memorandum is to certify SPC/E-4 Brian Keith Whitlock’s monthly gross earnings will be $2,062.80 for the period 18 Oct. 2007 through the end of our deployment sometime late in 2008,” the letter states.
However, Whitlock said a caseworker at KiBois told him he was wrong.
“They said somebody had done some legwork and said I would be making much more than at my civilian job,” he said. Whitlock said he asked the source of the information.
“They said they could not disclose it to me,” he said.
When Whitlock said he would not agree with what KiBois wanted, he said he was told he would be given a hearing date. A document signed by Administrative Law Judge Javier Ramirez set the hearing date for Oct. 29 — which is eight days after Brian Whitlock is to report for duty prior to his deployment to Iraq.
The rest of this outrageous story is here at the News-Capital, McAlester Oklahoma. Our bureaucracy in action! IMHO, they're acting like Hillary has already been elected.
KellyMac Takes On a Feminist
by Trudy W. Schuett
Point by point, she shreds the faux argument, sets a match to the straw men. You go, girl!
It's been posted quite recently, so there hasn't been time for the word to get out among the girls, but if her comments section is working she's sure to be lambasted for presenting this reasonable riposte to the truly bizarre claims made by this guy in response to the Dr. Helen interview with Glenn Sacks awhile back.
I'm tempted to verbally blast the guy myself, but that would be in direct violation of my own policy:
Never argue with a drunk or a feminist.
It's still a post well worth the read. Now what we need is 20 or 200 more KellyMacs to do the same.
UPDATE If you're looking to take on the girls yourself, or would just like to have an overview of some of the concepts behind the domestic violence industry, a good place to start is by reading this:
Disabusing The Definition Of Domestic Abuse: How Women Batter Men And The Role Of The Feminist State
by Linda Kelly This Florida State Law review article is here.
Technical info on restraining orders from David Heleniak (originally published in the Rutgers Law Review) here.








